Powerfully detailed that left me in awe of the truth.
Christina L Turner –
Rated 5 out of 5
The dictionary definition also states inspriation as breathing in (opposite of expiration=breathing out as part of respiration=the act of breathing). My question is: what is up with the change from in.. defined as in then out? is this a grammatical change over the years or some sort of translation issue? Any thought???
Christina L Turner –
Ok, here I am restudying this series nearly 2 years later and I would say that the foundation of the word inspiration seems to be “breathed in” (by the writer) the word that God “breathed out” so a transferance of the scripture from God to man whom he scripted the word by. Expirated by God and inspirated by the writer. (sorry for the continued confusion: I am a biology/anatomy/physiology teacher and “expiration and inspiration are specifically used for breathing out and in and cannot be confused-God inspired would not be God breathing in but the writer breathing in what God gave.)
Roy Fetzer –
Powerfully detailed that left me in awe of the truth.
Christina L Turner –
The dictionary definition also states inspriation as breathing in (opposite of expiration=breathing out as part of respiration=the act of breathing). My question is: what is up with the change from in.. defined as in then out? is this a grammatical change over the years or some sort of translation issue? Any thought???
Christina L Turner –
Ok, here I am restudying this series nearly 2 years later and I would say that the foundation of the word inspiration seems to be “breathed in” (by the writer) the word that God “breathed out” so a transferance of the scripture from God to man whom he scripted the word by. Expirated by God and inspirated by the writer. (sorry for the continued confusion: I am a biology/anatomy/physiology teacher and “expiration and inspiration are specifically used for breathing out and in and cannot be confused-God inspired would not be God breathing in but the writer breathing in what God gave.)